Is there a Biblical basis for the 2nd Amendment of the
US Constitution? Yes.

       Spoken by Jesus Christ:
       Luke 11:21 "When a strong man, FULLY ARMED, guards his own                             palace, his goods are in peace."
       In this verse Jesus commands us to go shopping and buy a weapon:
       Luke 22:36  "...and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment                             and buy one."
       From the Old Testament, God commands Ezekiel to tell those in        Jerusalem how to defend themselves:
       Ezekiel 9:1 Then HE called out in my hearing with a loud voice, saying,                            "Let those who have charge over the city draw near, each                            with a DEADLY WEAPON in his hand."

Get a free handgun and free gun training https://www.frontsight.com/free-gun.asp

2nd Amendment: Phyllis Schlafly http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/2nd-amendment/

The myth of 90% of guns in Mexico are from the United States http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2009/04/02/myth-percent-guns-mexico-fraction-number-claimed/

The following is a copy of a letter sent to the man who offers free handguns and free gun training in the first link above. It's the best explanation of the importance of self-defense that we've found so far:

To: Dr. Ignatius Piazza
Founder and Director
FrontSight.com

                                          The GUN is CIVILIZATION
                                        by Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)
     Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.
     In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
      When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.
     The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.
     There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat–it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.
     People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.
     Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.
     People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.
     The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.
     When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation…and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)
Original text found at: Eagle Forum of Sacramento

What would Jesus do.....read Luke 22:36 -"... if you have no weapon, sell your garment and buy one." This man is right. Jesus would buy a sword. In fact, in the next verse, Peter tells Jesus he has two swords, and Jesus says that is enough. This CNN reporter is like most of America today - typical left-wing-engendered fear of weapons, creating a false reason to make a blatant attempt to remove the 2nd Amendment. Nice try, but Christian Americans are smarter than CNN.
In the video below, a clever car dealer in Missouri offers a free AK-47 with the purchase of one of his cars. A CNN reporter tests him, but
he defends his position admirably.
TOP
         
             Proud to be an American  
Protecting American families
and traditional values
  
 
                              home          mission          members          about us           contact us          donate
 

 GUN RIGHTS